Milestone Extension: Construction and Operations Plan
Triggered missed date from extending Completeness Determination (Agency Action) within 30 days of its current target date which was 01/30/2023 and extended to 02/20/2026
Agency Milestone Date of 01/16/2023 for FWS determines ESA Consultation Package is Complete - Formal (Agency Action) has passed by 1 business days
Agency Milestone Date of 01/16/2023 for FWS determines ESA Consultation Package is Complete - Formal (Agency Action) has passed by 1 business days
Agency Milestone Date of 01/16/2023 for FWS determines ESA Consultation Package is Complete - Formal (Agency Action) has passed by 1 business days
Agency Milestone Date of 01/16/2023 for FWS determines ESA Consultation Package is Complete - Formal (Agency Action) has passed by 1 business days
Triggered missed date from extending NOAA determines EFH Assessment is Complete (Agency Action) within 30 days of its current target date which was 02/16/2023 and extended to 04/17/2023
NOAA is proposing to move milestones by 2 weeks due to BOEM submittal of the BA being delayed by 2 weeks. Proposed changes were put on the dashboard for both the "NOAA determines ESA Consultation Package is Complete" milestone and "ESA Consultation Concludes" milestone. The final milestone is being put back to what currently shows on the backend of the dashboard so the interim milestone can be updated. The final milestone will then be put back to what NOAA is proposing as 7/31/23. The final milestone will not be published with the new date until an ED determination i
Triggered missed date from extending Publish Proposed ITA in Federal Register (Agency Action) within 30 days of its current target date which was 01/10/2023 and extended to 02/09/2023
The primary driver of the schedule change, as described in the attached justification memo, is a requirement for the applicant’s contractor to recollect and test three additional sediment samples, as the original samples exceeded the holding times specified in their Corps/EPA-approved Sediment Analysis Plan and the Corps/EPA’s 2003 Regional Implementation Agreement, and could not be considered scientifically sound. The memo also describes an additional potential risk to the schedul